October 28, 2025

Stupification by Design, with Measurable Results

“…It’s only teenage wasteland… their all wasted!”


Crrow777

Do you accept that we are living in the information age? I would suggest that it is easily demonstrated that we are not. I would further put forward that a better descriptive moniker for this era would be “the Age of Deception.” The idea of an information age implies access to information and rising intelligence levels. Unfortunately, the stark reality of our time now is censorship, information control, and declining intelligence. The sharp decline in education levels is evident beyond denial at this point. We now have a generation of young minds that cannot read or write in cursive, read an analog clock, or use a physical map. While this is not comprehensive, it is a growing reality that is already evident.

Not only is information currently controlled and censored at levels heretofore unknown, but information (now often called content) is actively being used to execute societal manipulation and perception management, including imposing belief in false realities. We need look no further than entertainment to unveil prime examples of both perception manipulation and societal management on a grand scale. There is a catch in doing this, though. We have been indoctrinated into an alchemical crucible designed to impose psychological decay. Even when shown the evidence, many still deny that control and manipulation exist at this level. This, as Michael Hoffman has put forward, has created a growing number of “degenerate voyeurs spectating at their own demise.”

When my generation was young, one of the entertainment-based offerings that captured our attention was music and album covers. The Who’s album Who Are You which lacks a question mark after the titular question. We are told that the image used on the album was shot on May 28, 1978. In it, we see Keith Moon sitting in a chair that says, “Not to be taken away.” Keith Moon, we are told, died on September 7, 1978, some months later. Most people shown this will dismiss it as coincidence. Those who have recognized what entertainment in our era is for will not fail to comprehend the idea and name on The Who’s album that followed the departure of their drummer.

The artwork for Face Dances was designed by Peter Blake, who also helped orchestrate the album cover for Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, which stands as a cultural landmark and is known to encode a cornucopia of occult intention. In my eyes, the 1981 Who album title references what becomes of so many famous faces that we are told die. They change characters and roles, and of course, this album is the first without Keith Moon. I wonder what face he is dancing with now?

The Who’s album is only one case; another striking instance of symbolic messaging appears in the Supertramp cover for Breakfast in America.
To my knowledge, there was next to nobody introducing the idea that deaths are faked and identities change, and supported by evidence, until about 2010. The controversy surrounding the content and its creator left an unsavory impression, which did not help further awareness that this has been going on for a very long time. It became such a spectacle that I was even accused of being the actor, Kevin James. This actually occurred. When I stepped up to deal with the bearing of false witness, I was told to submit an image of my ear so “they” could clear me. After challenging the accuser to back up his false witness live on camera, everything about me stopped. When conduct like this is the messenger, the message is not likely to gain traction or meaningful attention. And yet, all these years later, very few have any idea of the “Face Dance” that is commonplace where fame and power exist.

Even now, there are astute observers trying to inform the world that not only is all the world a stage, but many players who die or disappear are simply changing characters and do not seem to pass on as most of us do, having access to something reminiscent of the Highlander storyline. But again, paranoia is creeping in once again as I watched a content creator, I respect watching him lay down evidence about the “Face Dance”. He mentions my name stating I do not trust him and then claims I am friends with an undesirable. So once again false witness is being put forward by one who does not know that I do not join groups of any kind nor do I make friends with other content creators. I learned some time back that this always blows up in your face, so now I am polite to all with my actual friends close.

I will point out one more album that is not easily dismissed to prove the manipulation that is part and parcel of entertainment. Breakfast in America, by the band Supertramp, was released, much like an alchemical procedure, at the spring equinox, March 16, 1979. I will set aside all the Masonic connections and simply point out the 9/11 pre-echo twenty-two years before the fact. There is no need to cover here what anyone can easily search, as so many have caught onto the 9/11 connection. Even Wikipedia mentions it, labeling it a “conspiracy” and dismissing it. Suffice it to say the entire cover art is a pre-echo to 911 including a mirror inverted 911 encode now well known. The previous album was titled Crime of the Century. It is almost like someone knew something twenty-two years before it happened. Twenty-two is often used as a “Master Builder” number by those with the eyes to see.

Have you ever noticed the number of movies that reuse titles without differentiating from films already made? We are told this has to do with copyright, among other things. For my part, I see a lack of creativity in a creative field and suspect there is another reason. This is what tends to happen when dishonesty becomes the fabric used to make every garment.

Let’s consider Ghostbusters from June 8, 1984, which now exists alongside a movie made on July 15, 2016, with the very same name and storyline, in a similar way. Here is where my suspicious mind fails to consider this topic normal. Is it possible that in a future where freedom is gone, feel-good classics will have no place in our world? Would such a movie show too much of the good times in America to future audiences? Is it possible the gender-swapped version of the same name was intended to replace it? Or how about another beloved classic from the same period? Is there a more beloved film than Back to the Future from the 1980s?

Did you know that the main character, Marty McFly, was originally played by Eric Stoltz and not Michael J. Fox? We are told they filmed for five weeks with Eric, then replaced him and filmed for ten weeks with Michael J. Fox. Again, is there a future when there will be no “happy” place for the original? Supposedly, the Eric character was much darker, and I am not ready to buy the mainstream story. I have learned that such things are regularly a manipulation. In the future will the original be swapped with the darker Eric Stolz version? I wonder.

Until we recognize the scope and reach of the long game that has been played in the attempted takeover of societies everywhere, we will be unable to consider what the mainstream tells us is conspiracy. And to be clear, the gender game is nothing new—not by a long shot—and characters have always changed their appearance. Lastly, I suggest that Highlander was putting forward a reality that has been going on for as long as civilization has existed. And I am not talking about the “there can only be one” idea. I am talking about why his character needed to fake his death all the time.

Recognizing this deception is the first step toward reclaiming discernment in an age that rewards illusion. And currently most of us have no idea what gender we are looking at, or how many roles the actor at hand has played… and for how long.

I wish you all a happy, healthy, and higher-minded new era.