December 9, 2025

Walter Russel, “Pretty Fly for a White Guy” – Schrödinger, “You Gotta Keep ‘Em Separated”

Crrow777

“What if modern physics is wrong, and has it all backwards? What if matter isn’t solid, but crystalized light, energy isn’t separate from consciousness but controlled by it, and the universe operates on principles of love instead and not random forces?”.

I have read time and again that those who try to communicate information from spiritual practice are actually recounting direct observation and experience. What’s more is that under those conditions it is not possible to use language to communicate the totality of what has been observed or experienced. Walter Russell is a very good example in this regard, having gained insight that he then communicates to the world. His spiritual experience occurred during what he called “The Story of My Illumining”. Interestingly Walter Russel was born and died on the same day, May 19, and experienced his illumination on May 21 – all three dates right at the Vernal Equinox. This is what he said of the experience: “During that period…I could perceive all motion,” and was newly “aware of all things.”

What is made clear by a number of authors, writing about spiritual experiences, is that science is based in materialism, while spiritual endeavors are not. And further, science intentionally draws a line that is not to be crossed with regard to anything “spiritual”.

It is my point of view that this was implemented intentionally, long ago. This was done to place limits on how far spiritual beings can progress. And yes, in my view, we are spiritual beings. Sadly, every effort has been made to control and limit us all through hyper-materialism. It is now that we are experiencing the end game of the hyper-materialism control agenda.

Among the many useful things Walter Russell left us is his observed experience of motion and matter. He says that matter is not solid but crystallized light slowed by thought, and that everything around us, from rocks to trees to our bodies, is composed of light patterns, shaped by consciousness.

Each time I read this, my mind immediately considers the very old tenet, “Mind precedes all”. It also starts to give reason to my earlier statement that every effort has been made to limit us. Are we far more powerful and creative than we have been led to believe? Yes, I accept that we are. In the new emerging age, this truth will prevail. Front and center. Beyond the ability of men in black robes to deny or limit.

In science, matter is dead for the most part. Everything is cordoned off into neat little boxes and divisions, hence the “you gotta keep ’em separated” … pun. Take the periodic table of elements, as an example. I have long thought that the element table is limiting us in the way it teaches us to consider such things. Even the naming of the latest so-called elements leaves me cold. With names like “Curium” my chill increases.

Marie Curie is an invented story used to further the idea that a magic red button exists that can destroy the world. She is also used to “prove” that radioactive things are deadly and must not be available to others. Did you know her name, when said three times fast, shows the game being played? If you do, you will hear an actual element name…Mercury.

As I have said so many times (and I am not alone by any stretch), Nukes do not exist as described. We should also consider that mainstream elements now come in “synthetic” (like Curium) flavors that do not occur in nature. They are found in the atomic numbers from 95 – 118. To top it off, synthetics above 99 have no use other than theoretical and research. Do you accept that this is a description of something elemental?

Do you want to “Come out and play” in the stage-free world? If so, you might consider that the only thing Madam Curie is the mother of…is nuclear fear porn, (to use a worn-out phrase). I wonder if she had a pet turtle who knew how to “duck and cover”. But alas, that was a propaganda cartoon too, not a real turtle.

Walter Russell gave us an elegant way to view and think about the elements, and it is free of synthetic things. Where the mainstream periodic table illustrates and divides, the Russell elemental approach declares and defines elements while showing the interconnectedness of all things. I have had my doubts about the existence of “particles” for a long time. Russel’s elegant spirals of interconnectedness go a long way towards validating my doubts.

Are particles just another scheme designed to “keep ‘em separated” while providing a foundation for NASA’s “everything spins” model? I get dizzy thinking about it. And for good reason. We are all spinning on a big particle at about the speed of a bullet fired from a handgun, or 1,000 mph(ish).

We live in an amazing place because that speed is nothing! Multiply 1,000 mph by 25 to realize how fast you have to go to reach escape velocity (25,000 mph) and leave Earth! But I am just stating the facts. We left earth a bunch of times over 50 years ago, way back in the 1960s. We went where no man has been before, or since.

With this last statement it seems prudent to demonstrate the trajectory of a fiction that has been passed off as a fact. Mainstream sources inform me that synthetic elements with an atomic number between 95 – 118 have no use other than theory and research. Curium is synthetic and carries an atomic number of 96, making it virtually useless according to the previous statement. Wikipedia also lists Curium as a “research only” synthetic element. And yet the following list quantifies the space-projects in which Curium has been used. Curium is used in: artificial cardiac pacemakers and RTGs, alpha particle X-ray, spectrometers in several space probes such as: Sojourner, Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity Mars rovers, also used in the Philae lander that landed on Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. See episode #049 on Crrow777Radio.com covering comet encoding, misinformation, and nonsense.

Unlike the elegant non-fiction description of elements provided by Russell, the above space mission hardware that used Curium is fictitious. The entirety of the list is fictitious. In the same imaginary vein as the Moon Landing. Mars is no different because it is not a destination we can reach from the material world we live in.

If the same people who defend the faked production, the Moon Landing, protest as I state that no Earth-made thing has ever been to Mars. They should take time to see clips I did on the interminable frauds from NASA. Here is a link to the supposed Philae/Rosetta mission that landed on a comet. Here I logically show the non-reality of what we are told about comets and NASA missions: Link: https://youtu.be/AsgA2cPOyRs?t=378 (time stamped link to start at “Philae” hoax). Here is a clip showing NASA image nonsense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2gB367GU2I.

If you are unable to comprehend the magnitude of NASA fakery after minimal research, I cannot help you. And if you recognize the level of fakery that can be proven, are you of a mind it was just one mission? I am here to tell you; I have never found a NASA mission that was not fictitious – to include the image library – which was cleaned up to hide fakery about 10 years ago. Here is a link showing image fraud from NASA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nRRROfHZts.

To be clear, the famous “Earth rise over the moon” image was proven fake in ten seconds using the levels method I showed you above for the comet landing fiction. By jacking levels on an image, it is proven that the image of earth was cropped from some other image and pasted into a Moon image. It also proved the Earth imaged chosen was the wrong size, and wrong phase lighting for the claimed time. And as a tip for anyone working with images, never forget the “Levels” method. Open any image and apply levels by sliding the light, mid, or dark slider to unveil hidden things. This method will also work for facial markings if there are any face dance researchers reading this – hint, hint.

Why is it that the work of Walter Russell has been dismissed and defamed by mainstream science? The above ideas about our periodic table, and faked NASA missions/images should answer that question. There is an agenda at play. The agenda not only seeks to dumb us all down and limit us, but it also deprives us of very basic information, like where we exist. All truth exists and is proven in nature. This is why truth and factual information are held far away from us. This effort also diminishes spiritual endeavors and values, the foundations of which are nature and truth. This is why we are fed a constant diet of hyper-materialism via science. In many respects, science has become its’ own religion. “Scientism.”

Lastly, in this episode our guest demonstrates just how close the ideas of mainstream scientist Erwin Schrödinger are to Walter Russell. They agree on many levels which is surprising to say the least. If you take time to do a quick wiki lookup on Schrödinger you will see he is actively being defamed. From atheism, to womanizing, and pedophilia, effort is being spent to create a negative image of a man long dead, and already known for his science. Why?

Much of his science is useful and balances with Walter Russell’s way of thinking. For my part the thought experiments put forward by Schrödinger are useful to next to no one. So much so that if his cat’s name was Theories, I would imagine it dead in the box next to a broken bottle of poison. Too much of modern science is theory, and proof of nothing. However, today we use theories as if they are actual laws, which they are not. Gravity is one of the theories that masquerades as law. Isn’t it time we get away from mainstream fictions, theories and systems that keep us removed from Nature where all truth is held and proven?

When truth is again part of science, spiritual concerns will bring to the table what cannot be weighed or measured. Consider how science currently labels the majority of so-called space as dark matter, a theory, while dismissing the ancient idea of Æther which fits neatly, and effectively in a philosophical system that works, and yielded impressive results for centuries. If Sherlock Holmes was here, I am sure he would inform dear Watson that it is elemental. But that is just more fiction, so I am here to tell you Æther was, and still should be, considered the 5th element, or quintessence. Find an early periodic table that existed before the information editing so common in the modern era, and you will find Æther included as element 0. This is often denied in our time. Before you do the same you might recall that spiritual realities cannot be weighed or measured, or described entirely using language.

I would like to wish you all a happy, healthy and higher-minded new era.